Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ntacpeering - Re: IP over AL2S call info (was Re: FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S)

Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group

List archive

Re: IP over AL2S call info (was Re: FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Chris Robb <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: IP over AL2S call info (was Re: FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S)
  • Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 13:01:16 -0400
  • Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport04.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none

To be clear, that's 2-3PM Eastern. To repeat:

2-3 ET / 1-2 CT / 11-12 PT
866-411-0013
0145454#



On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Chris Robb <> wrote:

Thanks to everyone who filled out the doodle poll. It looks like the best time is going to be this Friday from 2-3PM. Let's use the following bridge:

866-411-0013
0145454#

Talk with everyone then. 

-Chris

On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Chris Robb <> wrote:

All:

To date, David Crowe is the only community member to weigh in with a response to the doodle poll. While I'm incredibly confident in Dave's ability to single-handedly help engineer this, I think we can all agree that a wider participation base would be more ideal. Please try and fill the poll out by noon tomorrow so we can pick a time later in the week. 

-Chris


On May 22, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Chris Robb <> wrote:

All:

One of the action items out of the February architecture discussion was to look at how we logically organize the Layer3 network on top the Layer2 equipment. There was some good back and forth discussion in the later calls about whether or not to implement a full mesh of IP router-to-router VLANs over the IP network, how to prioritize the different interconnect technologies, and how to load share traffic on the L3-L2 interconnects. 

We've pulled together a document that provides a starting point for discussion. We've thought through a few of the scenarios and have attempted to highlight the advantages and gotchas to some of the approaches. This is not a complete view of everything and is meant to spur discussion. 

We purposefully don't make a recommendation here. I'm interested in hearing about options and permutations we need to add to this document and other feedback on the pros and cons. 

I suggest we spend this next week iterating on this via e-mail and try to get together on a call the week of June 3rd to discuss. I've created a doodle pool with some potential times to chat. Hopefully we can find a time that works for a large number of interested parties. 


Given that we have equipment being installed in the next week to put most of this in place, we'd like to start thinking about beginning to stand pieces of this up in the mid-June timeframe. 

Thanks. Looking forward to the conversation! 

-Chris


<IP over AL2S 20130522.pdf>

-- 
Chris Robb, Internet2 Director of Operations and Engineering
O: 812.855.8604  C: 812.345.3188
****************
Visit our website: www.internet2.edu
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/internet2
Become a Fan on Facebook: www.internet2.edu/facebook


-- 
Chris Robb, Internet2 Director of Operations and Engineering
O: 812.855.8604  C: 812.345.3188
****************
Visit our website: www.internet2.edu
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/internet2
Become a Fan on Facebook: www.internet2.edu/facebook


-- 
Chris Robb, Internet2 Director of Operations and Engineering
O: 812.855.8604  C: 812.345.3188
****************
Visit our website: www.internet2.edu
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/internet2
Become a Fan on Facebook: www.internet2.edu/facebook


-- 
Chris Robb, Internet2 Director of Operations and Engineering
O: 812.855.8604  C: 812.345.3188
****************
Visit our website: www.internet2.edu
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/internet2
Become a Fan on Facebook: www.internet2.edu/facebook




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page