Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ntacpeering - Re: heads up on Microsoft future peering announcement

Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group

List archive

Re: heads up on Microsoft future peering announcement


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael H Lambert <>
  • To: NTAC <>
  • Cc: NTAC Peering and Routing WG <>
  • Subject: Re: heads up on Microsoft future peering announcement
  • Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 11:55:47 -0400
  • Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport01.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
On 24 May 2013, at 11:25, Michael H Lambert wrote:

> Speaking pragmatically, I think I'm more concerned about congesting the
> TR-CPS links than removing too much headroom on the R&E links. I won't
> argue that this view is *right*.

Replying to my own mail (sorry!)...

If there is a strong consensus that this view is flat-out wrong, then maybe
we as a community need to re-evaluate and re-justify the existence of TR-CPS.
Perhaps we need to look at peering strictly on the local and regional
levels, even though that would mean more collective effort and the loss of
economy of scale.

Michael


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page