NTAC Peering Working Group

[John Hernandez <>]

Apple's iOS update got you poking around?  Our Akamai farm's traffic spiked 
by ~ 2.5 Gb/s (more than doubled) at release time, and it's still way up 
there.

Back to your question though, supposing one of those (roughly 350) server 
farms is chosen by Akamai DNS-foo to serve us content, I don't see why TR/CPS 
would be a bad choice for pushing ACK's, regardless of which path the bulk 
data takes. 

On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Michael H Lambert wrote:

> In looking at the TR-CPS routing table, I see a number of routes with 20940 
> (Akamai) in the AS path.  The vast majority of these are NOT "^11164 20940 
> .*".  I can't imagine that these other destinations would serve content to 
> random sources in our community, so is there any reason that they should be 
> accepted into the routing table?  I could imagine their presence leading to 
> some weird return paths.  I'm assuming that "^11164 20940$" would work as 
> expected.
> 
> Michael
> 

-- 

John Hernandez, Network Engineer
1850 Table Mesa Drive, Boulder, CO 80305
Tel. 303-497-1280  Fax. 303-497-1818