Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] LESA (was:Re: [External] Re: ARIN, RPKI, and legal barriers....)

Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG

List archive

Re: [Security-WG] LESA (was:Re: [External] Re: ARIN, RPKI, and legal barriers....)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Dale W. Carder" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Security-WG] LESA (was:Re: [External] Re: ARIN, RPKI, and legal barriers....)
  • Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:46:49 -0500

Thus spake Spurling, Shannon () on Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at
04:46:32PM +0000:
> We have had an LRSA with ARIN for some time, and yet we still had to argue
> with them over the removal of the indemnification and binding arbitration
> clauses in the TOS for the ROA’s. Be sure to have all legal documentation
> on hand and ready to present. If they don’t think it is persuasive enough,
> they will ask you to agree to the TOS as presented, regardless of what your
> LRSA states.
>
> My biggest issue with the ROAs is if they need to be specific or if they
> can be set for a range of prefixes. There is the ability to do so, but
> there are a lot of people who feel they need to be specific only.

I'd start here:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidrops-rpkimaxlen-01

Or what's referenced in there, the work that Sharon Goldberg's group did.
All of her work is worth keeping an eye on for that matter:
http://www.cs.bu.edu/~goldbe/

Dale



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page