Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question

Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG

List archive

Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Chris Wilkinson <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question
  • Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:38:06 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: internet2.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;internet2.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=internet2.edu;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:0

Agreed, as exemplified by this handy, easily geocoded, field guide…

http://www.level3.com/~/media/files/factsheets/en_datactr_fs_datacenterlocations.pdf


On 9/5/17, 10:36 AM, "Steven Wallace"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

thinking a bit more, I agree/concor, it’s hard to see this as being worth
it, and it would be work, and an exception to the normal workflow.

GPS doesn’t work inside the building, and the buildings’ locations are
well known.


> On Sep 5, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Michael H Lambert
<>
wrote:
>
>> On 5 Sep 2017, at 10:19, Matthew J Zekauskas
<>
wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I think the accuracy/precision values in the records are all
defaults (which would lead me to believe they were not explicitly set). I
could be wrong; I just glanced at the RFC
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1876>.
>
> I concur that that's the likeliest possibility. Again, I'll reiterate
that I don't think it's worth the effort to change them.
>
> Michael
>






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page