Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question

Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG

List archive

Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Steven Wallace <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question
  • Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:35:45 -0400
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

thinking a bit more, I agree/concor, it’s hard to see this as being worth it,
and it would be work, and an exception to the normal workflow.

GPS doesn’t work inside the building, and the buildings’ locations are well
known.


> On Sep 5, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Michael H Lambert
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> On 5 Sep 2017, at 10:19, Matthew J Zekauskas
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I think the accuracy/precision values in the records are all
>> defaults (which would lead me to believe they were not explicitly set).
>> I could be wrong; I just glanced at the RFC
>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1876>.
>
> I concur that that's the likeliest possibility. Again, I'll reiterate that
> I don't think it's worth the effort to change them.
>
> Michael
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page