netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question
Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG
List archive
- From: Steven Wallace <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:35:45 -0400
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
thinking a bit more, I agree/concor, it’s hard to see this as being worth it,
and it would be work, and an exception to the normal workflow.
GPS doesn’t work inside the building, and the buildings’ locations are well
known.
> On Sep 5, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Michael H Lambert
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> On 5 Sep 2017, at 10:19, Matthew J Zekauskas
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I think the accuracy/precision values in the records are all
>> defaults (which would lead me to believe they were not explicitly set).
>> I could be wrong; I just glanced at the RFC
>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1876>.
>
> I concur that that's the likeliest possibility. Again, I'll reiterate that
> I don't think it's worth the effort to change them.
>
> Michael
>
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Paul Howell, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Steven Wallace, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Steven Wallace, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Jason Zurawski, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, James Deaton, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Chris Wilkinson, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Michael H Lambert, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Steven Wallace, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Matthew J Zekauskas, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Michael H Lambert, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Steven Wallace, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Chris Wilkinson, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Jeff Bartig, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Michael H Lambert, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Matthew J Zekauskas, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Steven Wallace, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Michael H Lambert, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, David Farmer, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Paul Howell, 09/05/2017
- Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question, Steven Wallace, 09/05/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.