Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question

Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG

List archive

Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael H Lambert <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Security-WG] DNS Location record question
  • Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:28:17 -0400
  • Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailer1.psc.edu v85ESIDs029835
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

> On 5 Sep 2017, at 10:19, Matthew J Zekauskas
> <>
> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I think the accuracy/precision values in the records are all defaults
> (which would lead me to believe they were not explicitly set). I could
> be wrong; I just glanced at the RFC <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1876>.

I concur that that's the likeliest possibility. Again, I'll reiterate that I
don't think it's worth the effort to change them.

Michael




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page