Internet2 Network Security SIG

[gcbrowni <>]

That’s a good point and something I’ve struggled with in creating the survey. 
The real value here is the free text comments and I worry if the suvery 
encourages folks enough to work at those sections.

I’ll go ahead and modify with a "Partial (please explain below)"

I appreciate folks taking a look at this and providing feedback. I hope to 
get the "Real" survey out this Friday to NTAC, security-wg, and the attendees 
of the first workshop.

-G






> On Nov 4, 2016, at 3:52 PM, Michael H Lambert 
> <>
>  wrote:
> 
> Grover,
> 
>> On 4 Nov 2016, at 10:25, 
>> 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Many of the questions are Yes/No, or other simple choices. We would like 
>> to encourage you to use the free text fields to provide nuance and 
>> explanations to your answers. This nuance is far more important than the 
>> Yes/No answer. We'll use the nuance to help provide guidance on that 
>> specific area in paper that will result.
> 
> For some of the Yes/No questions, I wonder if it would be more useful to 
> have Yes/Partial/No instead?  In a heterogeneous environment with multiple 
> edge devices, they might not all support all features (or, strange as it 
> may seem, someone might have overlooked something somewhere).
> 
> Michael

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature