Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

netsec-sig - Re: [Security-WG] I2 - DRAFT routing security survey

Subject: Internet2 Network Security SIG

List archive

Re: [Security-WG] I2 - DRAFT routing security survey


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael H Lambert <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Security-WG] I2 - DRAFT routing security survey
  • Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 15:52:24 -0400
  • Authentication-results: mailer2.psc.edu; dmarc=none header.from=psc.edu
  • Authentication-results: mailer2.psc.edu; spf=pass
  • Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mailer2.psc.edu uA4JqO28028228
  • Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 mailer2.psc.edu uA4JqO28028228
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:wabuHBfJKKtYyoezAcK8tuDelGMj4u6mDksu8pMizoh2WeGdxc6+ZB7h7PlgxGXEQZ/co6odzbGH6eawCCdZus/JmUtBWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnYsExnyfTB4Ov7yUtaLyZ/mjabiqtaKOFwArQH+SIs6FA+xowTVu5teqqpZAYF19CH0pGBVcf9d32JiKAHbtR/94sCt4MwrqHwI6Lpyv/JHBL73dLkiTKBJSSspG2Ez+MDxsxTfF02C6mZPfH8Rl09tAgPF5Rz+Fre5liL/vOdnxGHOOcTzR70uRRy69KwtRRP13nRUfwUl+X3a35QjxJlQpwis8kRy
Grover,

> On 4 Nov 2016, at 10:25,
>
> wrote:
>
> Many of the questions are Yes/No, or other simple choices. We would like to
> encourage you to use the free text fields to provide nuance and
> explanations to your answers. This nuance is far more important than the
> Yes/No answer. We'll use the nuance to help provide guidance on that
> specific area in paper that will result.

For some of the Yes/No questions, I wonder if it would be more useful to have
Yes/Partial/No instead? In a heterogeneous environment with multiple edge
devices, they might not all support all features (or, strange as it may seem,
someone might have overlooked something somewhere).

Michael


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page