ndt-dev - Re: [ndt-dev] Advice in resolving issue #102
Subject: NDT-DEV email list created
List archive
- From: Jakub Sławiński <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [ndt-dev] Advice in resolving issue #102
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:45:10 +0100
Hi Sebastian,
Issue #102 is about handling 9977 on the Java side, so adding this check
should be enough to close this ticket.
The comments in this issue are about other inconsistencies between
different implementations and specification, but there was no decision
about what to do with them.
We have two possible ways of resolving Issue #102 and related
inconsistencies:
1.
a) handle 9977 on the Java side and close #102
b) agree on the mailing list about which statuses should be used in
which cases
c) Create appropriate issue(s) to implement the proposed changes
2.
a) agree on the mailing list about which statuses should be used in
which cases
b) update the Issue #102 title/description with the proposed changes
c) implement the proposed changes and close #102
I would personally suggests the first option, but Aaron should decide
which way to go.
Regards,
Jakub.
On 02/11/2014 04:25 PM, Sebastian Malecki wrote:
> Hi.
> I've just try to resolve problem from issue #102. The main problem isn't
> difficult, but I'm not sure what to do with Jakub suggestion
> (https://code.google.com/p/ndt/issues/detail?id=102#c1).
>
> 1.
> Do we need "SRV_QUEUE_SERVER_BUSY_60s", which is only implemented in
> clients,
> but it's never send by server. It's even not in documentation
> (https://code.google.com/p/ndt/wiki/NDTProtocol#Queuing_clients).
> Please let me know if I understand because "Server Busy: Please wait 60
> seconds for previous test to finish" is not precise enough for me. Busy_60s
> should be send if server drop the connection and client try connect faster
> than 60s? Only after "9988" message or also after "9977"?
>
> 2.
> And question about: SRV_QUEUE_SERVER_FAULT. In most places server send 9988
> (SRV_QUEUE_SERVER_BUSY), but in my opinion it should be send only from:
> https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/browse/trunk/src/web100srv.c#2291,
> right?
>
> In my opinion "9977" should be send from:
> https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/browse/trunk/src/web100srv.c#2030
> https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/browse/trunk/src/web100srv.c#2049 (as
> in
> the command)
> https://code.google.com/p/ndt/source/browse/trunk/src/web100srv.c#2083
>
- [ndt-dev] Advice in resolving issue #102, Sebastian Malecki, 02/11/2014
- Re: [ndt-dev] Advice in resolving issue #102, Jakub Sławiński, 02/12/2014
- Re: [ndt-dev] Advice in resolving issue #102, Aaron Brown, 02/12/2014
- Re: [ndt-dev] Advice in resolving issue #102, Jakub Sławiński, 02/12/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.