mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Brent Putman <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:56:33 -0400
On 5/19/11 10:20 AM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
>
>
> Then you're probably using the wrong Extensions classes, I'm sure there
> are parallel objects in the other package.
Actually there isn't. For reasons obscured by history, whoever
implemented that originally chose to have just a common Extensions
provider, which is used for both the metadata and protocols Extensions
elements (other than the namespace, they have the same schema). I
personally wouldn't have chosen to do it that way b/c I think it's
confusing, but that's the way it is.
- [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, rangeli nepal, 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, Cantor, Scott E., 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, rangeli nepal, 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, Cantor, Scott E., 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, rangeli nepal, 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, Brent Putman, 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, Cantor, Scott E., 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, Brent Putman, 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, rangeli nepal, 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, Brent Putman, 05/19/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, rangeli nepal, 05/20/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] Marshaling an Extension, Cantor, Scott E., 05/19/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.