mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 06:55:40 -0500
- Organization: Itumi, LLC
OpenSAML already has support for the various defined artifacts, so you don't need to implement those specifically. As far as which type to use, it's up to you. Personally I find type 4 artifacts, the one you're talking about, a lot easier to use than the other ones because it doesn't require looking up data via hashes or other such work.
On 11/18/10 6:45 AM, Siva prakash I V wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to implement SAML artifact binding. I've read that a SAML
artifact needs to be a 44 byte sequence
containing TYPECODE (2 bytes) ENDPOINTINDEX (2 bytes) SOURCEID (20
bytes) MESSAGE_HANDLE(20 bytes).
Is this Format along with the accommodated size is a MANDATORY one or a
RECOMMENDED one.
As an issuer of Artifact can I create an artifact having more than 20
byte MESSAGE_HANDLE. Is this an acceptable one?
Thanks,
Siva Prakash
--
Chad La Joie
http://itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered
- [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Siva prakash I V, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Chad La Joie, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Siva prakash I V, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Chad La Joie, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Siva prakash I V, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Chad La Joie, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Siva prakash I V, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Chad La Joie, 11/18/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.