mace-opensaml-users - [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Siva prakash I V <>
- To:
- Subject: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:15:45 +0530
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SHwgQHyxn36zC6U02SgB9h/kLGRsoB8rd2gXqlhvSOovaDTlJ8+375pzGQZgEjWNiv SfUzpes//02CuBDi2w4RuSZeTEX7o9vl1Hhae9k2X5dfATgVyDDoKyBz3Tosrcoe9ihR 6j9U7fnRJ4v+L9qrZFicLAc8Jpwbge2sqloK4=
Hi,
I'm trying to implement SAML artifact binding. I've read that a SAML artifact needs to be a 44 byte sequence
containing TYPECODE (2 bytes) ENDPOINTINDEX (2 bytes) SOURCEID (20 bytes) MESSAGE_HANDLE(20 bytes).
Is this Format along with the accommodated size is a MANDATORY one or a RECOMMENDED one.
As an issuer of Artifact can I create an artifact having more than 20 byte MESSAGE_HANDLE. Is this an acceptable one?
Thanks,
Siva Prakash
- [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Siva prakash I V, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Chad La Joie, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Siva prakash I V, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Chad La Joie, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Siva prakash I V, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Chad La Joie, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Siva prakash I V, 11/18/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Regarding SAML artifact size, Chad La Joie, 11/18/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.