mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:45:15 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> No. I am want to make sure the code segment I have is right, as I tried in
> multiple signature validators and all failed to validate.
I'm sure your code's probably wrong, but that doesn't make it a simple
matter to determine why. I didn't understand anything you said about the
Reference issue, as Reference syntax in SAML is fixed by the spec.
> > Signature signature = (new
> > SignatureBuilder()).buildObject();
> >
> > Namespace signNS = new
> > Namespace("http://www.w3.org/2009/09/xmldsig#", "");
FWIW, that namespace code looks suspicious to me, but if some example you
got from the wiki says to do it, I guess it's ok.
The only way you're going to debug this is to obtain logs of the digest
input on both ends and compare them. None of that has anything to do with
this code, it's dependent on the signing library underneath.
-- Scott
- XACMLPolicyQuery target, Massimiliano Masi, 08/27/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] XACMLPolicyQuery target, HÃ¥kon Sagehaug, 08/27/2009
- Message not available
- RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Chad La Joie, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
- Message not available
- Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Deena Gurajala, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Deena Gurajala, 08/28/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Deena Gurajala, 08/28/2009
- Endorsing Jars in Weblogic, ravi . balasubramanian, 08/31/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] Endorsing Jars in Weblogic, Chad La Joie, 08/31/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Chad La Joie, 08/28/2009
- RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- Message not available
- Re: [OpenSAML] XACMLPolicyQuery target, HÃ¥kon Sagehaug, 08/27/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.