mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] XACMLPolicyQuery target
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Håkon Sagehaug <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] XACMLPolicyQuery target
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:02:46 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=b3qKwtrcC6Rm9gXofCn8KNbrI4aQs7nEdXsWNgy+uUkMp4Ek4rhl1nZpmw+sajy3jr ItQ+h0xkVjYAo1fAdDUXEWVFoPYktfgtGPxj984rrdcPftyTUPYuWBJma94KoDAxilSP jl2ytbjh3NxfRwfpJ2ZpyM0dYTBUH3lrgPKzk=
Hi Massimiliano
I think the class XACMLPolicyQuery was implemented with the this [1] schema in mind. Also this might explain error you got in the other email you sent. The element for XACMLPolicyQuery looks like this in the schema referred
<element name="XACMLPolicyQuery" xsi:type="xacml-samlp:XACMLPolicyQueryType" />
<complexType name="XACMLPolicyQueryType">
<complexContent>
<extension base="samlp:RequestAbstractType">
<choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<element ref="xacml-context:Request" />
<element ref="xacml:PolicySetIdReference" />
<element ref="xacml:PolicyIdReference" />
</choice>
</extension>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=32425
cheers, håkon
2009/8/27 Massimiliano Masi <>
Hi All,
In the profile for XACML and SAML the XACMLPolicyQuery has
a choice among Request, Target, PolicySetIdReference, PolicyIdRefrence.
The getRequests() permits to add XACML requests,
the getPolicySetIdReference() adds id to policy set,
the policyIdReference to policy Id,
but which method can be used for adding a policy TargetType?
Thanks,
Massimiliano
--
Massimiliano Masi
http://www.mascanc.net/~max
--
Håkon Sagehaug, Scientific Programmer
Parallab, Bergen Center for Computational Science (BCCS)
UNIFOB AS (University of Bergen Research Company)
- XACMLPolicyQuery target, Massimiliano Masi, 08/27/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] XACMLPolicyQuery target, Håkon Sagehaug, 08/27/2009
- Message not available
- RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Chad La Joie, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
- Message not available
- Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Deena Gurajala, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
- RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Chad La Joie, 08/28/2009
- RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
- Message not available
- Re: [OpenSAML] XACMLPolicyQuery target, Håkon Sagehaug, 08/27/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.