mace-opensaml-users - XACMLPolicyQuery target

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

XACMLPolicyQuery target

From: Massimiliano Masi <>
To:
Subject: XACMLPolicyQuery target
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:10:40 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=eOtZ9BsuvDXyus8sUr2FEpL9LfR8ehyo5G2KQC6JkNNL9s8IV/zBnpRv0xsjHS+TyO 3dFLslRZD5xZJXHnkF/6tU3qY2O5a2VInZYpFC9FUiJNgSqbKkOtV6G/q+xcGbW7+/F6 bbjiE+VjNdhJX+4jqjTLABrsXiFTmpIPW0TeA=

Hi All,

In the profile for XACML and SAML the XACMLPolicyQuery has
a choice among Request, Target, PolicySetIdReference, PolicyIdRefrence.

The getRequests() permits to add XACML requests,
the getPolicySetIdReference() adds id to policy set,
the policyIdReference to policy Id,

but which method can be used for adding a policy TargetType?

Thanks,

Massimiliano

--
Massimiliano Masi

http://www.mascanc.net/~max

XACMLPolicyQuery target, Massimiliano Masi, 08/27/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] XACMLPolicyQuery target, Håkon Sagehaug, 08/27/2009
  - Message not available
    - RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
      - Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Chad La Joie, 08/28/2009
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
        RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
        RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Ravi Balasubramanian, 08/28/2009
        RE: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Scott Cantor, 08/28/2009
        
        Message not available
        Re: [OpenSAML] RE: Digital signature not valid, Deena Gurajala, 08/28/2009

List archive

XACMLPolicyQuery target