OpenSAML user discussion

["Scott Cantor" <>]

> I also built a very simple application with all of the code in main:
> 
>       XMLToolingConfig::getConfig().init();
>       SAMLConfig::getConfig().init();

Brian, this part at least is wrong if you look at the method signatures. You
don't initialize both this way, or if you do, you need to pass a false
parameter to the second init() call to prevent dual initialization.

Normally a SAML app just does an init() on the SAMLConfig and lets it handle
the lower level init().

I don't know what that will do exactly, but it may be causing a problem for
you. Try changing that and let me know.

-- Scott