OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

If not him than me, since I was the one that forgot to change the text.  ;)

I'll update it and make sure it's fixed in the next release.

Bleu Rubin wrote:
> excellent.
>
> Can I quote you on that ;)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Brent Putman 
> <>
>  wrote:
> > Rest easy.  That's just an error in the RELEASE-NOTES.txt file, it
> > apparently hasn't been updated since the Technology Preview releases.  We
> > will correct the verbage.  OpenSAML2 became fully supported for production
> > use, including stable API's etc as of release 2.0.0 (mid-March 2008), and
> > this includes the just-released 2.1.0.   (Actually the API's were pretty
> > stable quite awhile before that).
> >
> >  Thanks for pointing out.
> >
> >  --Brent
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >  wrote:
> >
> > > I'm working on using the OpenSAML2 library for our service provider code,
> > and I just got around to reading the release note for the 2.1.0 release, and
> > this snippet:
> > > "This technology preview is meant as an early release to allow developers
> > to comment on the structure and APIs.  No guarantee about the stability of
> > the
> > > APIs are made; they will likely change.  This release should NEVER be used
> > in a
> > > production system."
> > >
> > > is putting my boss off.  Is this just a case of CYA?  Is anyone using this
> > code in a production environment?  It seems relatively mature, what's the
> > problem?  When is it anticipated to be stable enough to get rid of that last
> > line?
> > > thanks,
> > > Bleu

--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
 http://www.switch.ch