mace-opensaml-users - Re: Regarding OpenSAML 2.0
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Regarding OpenSAML 2.0
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:20:44 +0100
- Organization: SWITCH
You're probably very safe in using the release candidate that was jut made available. The API is frozen and so far our testers haven't found any bugs. I imagine the final release, which will be timed with the final release of Shibboleth, will be in about a month (subject to any major bugs that may be found, other time constraints, and the like).
Sumit Lonial wrote:
Hi,
We are using Open SAML 1.1 and Open SAML 1.0 from last 3 years in our
product successfully and we want to upgrade to OpenSAML 2.0 to Support
SAML 2.0 Standard , Is it available for production use or is still under
development?
In opensaml website it is mentioned that opensaml 2.0 lib is still under
development.
Thanks,
Sumit
--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
http://www.switch.ch
- [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Chad La Joie, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Chad La Joie, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Chad La Joie, 01/29/2008
- Regarding OpenSAML 2.0, Sumit Lonial, 01/29/2008
- Re: Regarding OpenSAML 2.0, Tom Scavo, 01/29/2008
- Re: Regarding OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 01/30/2008
- Regarding OpenSAML 2.0, Sumit Lonial, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Chad La Joie, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/29/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.