mace-opensaml-users - Re: Regarding OpenSAML 2.0
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Tom Scavo" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Regarding OpenSAML 2.0
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:45:14 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fgqEiwuU42V1MbUX24A5ZwC+AFpVPpqIK2jF8sI70AVPtNRSyuA3AVlWhCwaknQgmPT5MaWTkkXG4RTI4tHH68KqpCjzFOmPtiRqGwsQ4UYMJr6hjgFdS1WPK0fXmAfgnRPO+q1SHxQxV0S0oOe4laOBycuumID/j6zknyRG12I=
Check the archives:
https://mail.internet2.edu/wws/info/mace-opensaml-users
A Release Candidate of OpenSAML v2.0 was announced just last week.
Tom
On Jan 29, 2008 1:19 PM, Sumit Lonial
<>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using Open SAML 1.1 and Open SAML 1.0 from last 3 years in our
> product successfully and we want to upgrade to OpenSAML 2.0 to Support
> SAML 2.0 Standard , Is it available for production use or is still under
> development?
>
> In opensaml website it is mentioned that opensaml 2.0 lib is still under
> development.
>
> Thanks,
> Sumit
>
- [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Chad La Joie, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Chad La Joie, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Chad La Joie, 01/29/2008
- Regarding OpenSAML 2.0, Sumit Lonial, 01/29/2008
- Re: Regarding OpenSAML 2.0, Tom Scavo, 01/29/2008
- Re: Regarding OpenSAML 2.0, Chad La Joie, 01/30/2008
- Regarding OpenSAML 2.0, Sumit Lonial, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Chad La Joie, 01/29/2008
- Re: [OpenSAML2.0] Problem in BasicParserPool.initializePool, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/29/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.