Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Håkon Sagehaug" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:45:48 +0100
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=QJ9drFJeJ3GN+qNwn9fMQAHUZphJlZacop/YYNeYvQ1AVbFAUfI+KF4RD/DxYzKX1mF8fp9GllzxWHiPo3KgFlSQt/aE/7MdAQQNgLkPAqS02QCZxtTUYKdWEArktcrmLUguwEHr2t1PIf0P2X9wr4ot8gGR8icQTjBwt+vARug=

Hi

I want to be able to validate a saml assertion with a public key aginst my trused host certificates in a directory. So from browsing the xml-tooling library, I ve found these three trust engins

1. ExplicitKeyTrustEngine
2. ExplicitX509CertificateTrustEngine
3. PKIXX509CredentialTrustEngine

And not sure what to use, is 1 best if its the key one wants to compare. Or is some other way better for this type use.

cheers

--
Håkon Sagehaug
Research Assistant
Parallab
Bergen Center for Computational Science (BCCS)
UNIFOB AS (University of Bergen Research Company)


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page