mace-opensaml-users - Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Brent Putman <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:26:04 -0500
If you haven't already, you may want to take a look at this Wiki topic, which discusses these trust engines as used in Shibboleth:
https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/SHIB/TrustEngine
The ExplicitX509CertificateTrustEngine is just a variant on the ExplicitKey one, that compares the entire cert for equality with a trusted cert rather than just the public key. We don't use in Shibboleth, but I went ahead and added because it was easy and somebody may want to use it.
In the Java stack, these obtain trusted information against which to validate the untrusted token (key/cert as encapsulated by an instance of our Credential interface) via a trusted information resolver. For the key and certificate ones, it uses a CredentialResolver to resolve trusted Credentials, for the PKIX one it uses a PKIXValidationInformationResolver. These take as an input a CriteriaSet which specifies criteria for resolving the trusted information (e.g. the SAML entity ID of the signer).
If you have the peer's actual key/cert in advance (by value) then you'd probably want to use the ExplicitKeyTrustEngine in conjunction with a CredentialResolver that can resolve the set of trustedCredentials (e.g. from SAML metadata). Otherwise you'd probably want to use the PKIX engine.
Note these trust engines are primarily for cases where you just want to establish trust of a key/cert that has been presented, where any crypto has already been performed (so e.g. establish trust of a client TLS cert). If what you're trying to do is validate an XML or raw/blob signature, there are SignatureTrustEngine impls that do the signature validation and then establish trust using similar mechanisms and logic (explicit key vs. PKIX). Those are in the signature and signature.impl packages in java-xmltooling. It wasn't quite clear from your question what you wanted to do (i.e. validate the Assertions's signature?).
HTH,
Brent
Håkon Sagehaug wrote:
Hi
I want to be able to validate a saml assertion with a public key aginst my trused host certificates in a directory. So from browsing the xml-tooling library, I ve found these three trust engins
1. ExplicitKeyTrustEngine
2. ExplicitX509CertificateTrustEngine
3. PKIXX509CredentialTrustEngine
And not sure what to use, is 1 best if its the key one wants to compare. Or is some other way better for this type use.
cheers
--
Håkon Sagehaug
Research Assistant
Parallab
Bergen Center for Computational Science (BCCS)
UNIFOB AS (University of Bergen Research Company)
- Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/10/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Brent Putman, 01/10/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/11/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/15/2008
- RE: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Scott Cantor, 01/15/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Brent Putman, 01/15/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/16/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Brent Putman, 01/16/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/16/2008
- Message not available
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/16/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Chad La Joie, 01/16/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/16/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Chad La Joie, 01/16/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Chad La Joie, 01/16/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/16/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/15/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Håkon Sagehaug, 01/11/2008
- Re: Classes needed for validating a saml assertion with a public key, Brent Putman, 01/10/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.