OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

Yeah, we've worried about that too.   :)

My understanding is that they are in the process of a setting up...
umm...  more robust support for SAML.

Chances are they are making certain assumptions about the content, or
layout, of the SAML that you aren't making.  This would certainly be
likely if they are in fact using a template based approach.  I don't
know anything about their current code however to know what they're doing.

Paul Hethmon wrote:
> Has anyone  used the OpenSAML 2 libraries to integrate with Google?   
> 
> I'm working on it as a test of my Idp code and I'm getting a generic
> "error parsing response" from them. Looking at their sample
> implementation makes me worry since they use a template based approach
> to create the SAML messages. I'm worried that they are not procesing the
> XML as SAML, but just trying to pull out the XML nodes they want (or
> something like that). My XML is well formed, though I wouldn't guarantee
> I have every element right (I think so though).
> 
> Anyway, if anyone has any insight on the matter, it would be
> appreciated.

-- 
Chad La Joie             2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware           202.687.0124