Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: namespace prefix

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: namespace prefix


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Asa Hardcastle <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: namespace prefix
  • Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:00:50 -0400

I have figured it out. Basically the saml assertion that I was given is not properly formed .. eg has the wrong case for elements and attributes. So the bug is in the assertion, and in my understanding. solved.

later,

asa

--
Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty
Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7



On Jul 11, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Chad La Joie wrote:

Asa, is the marshaller/unmarshaller part of some of the code you're writing or are you seeing it the SAML code (i.e. my bug or yours ;))?

Asa Hardcastle wrote:
I was on the wrong trail. After further investigation, it turns out that the problem turns out to be case.
this gets unmarshalled:
<xyz:Assertion ID="asdasdasdasdasdasd"
this does not:
<xyz:assertion id="asdasdasdasdasdasd"
Is there a setting for ignore case? (on both attributes and elements)
thanks,
asa
--
Asa Hardcastle, Technical Lead, openLiberty
Tel: +1.413.429.1044 Skype: subsystem7
On Jul 11, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Scott Cantor wrote:
How do I handle random namespace prefixes? Like this for example:

Define "handle". Our code doesn't change prefixes, it just tracks them as
best it can. It will probably add different prefixes if the objects are
modified or added to, but if it makes the XML non-well-formed, there's a
bug.

That said, while our code is vastly more willing to actually try and deal
with stuff like this than the average library, whatever code is producing
that needs to be taken out and shot.

-- Scott



--
Chad La Joie 2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware 202.687.0124




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page