OpenSAML user discussion

[Brent Putman <>]

Thanks, Paul.  I have fixed those 2  generic parameters in the policy
rule method signatures.  Out of curiosity, what JDK (vendor/version) are
you using?   We have previously seen cases where some compilers (e.g.
IBM) were more strict with respect to generic syntax (this omission was
an unintentional error, however).

--Brent



Paul Hethmon wrote:
> Chad,
>
> Just my experience here after updating my code:
>
> java-xmltooling  -- compiles and tests fine
> java-openws -- fails one of the tests
> java-opensaml2 -- had to change two files for a clean compile:
>
>  org.opensaml.common.binding.impl.ReplayRuleFactory.java
>  org.opensaml.common.binding.impl.IssueInstantRuleFactory.java
>
> Both choked on:
>
>  public void evaluate(RequestType request, XMLObject message,
> SecurityPolicyContext context)
>
> Had to be:
>
>  public void evaluate(RequestType request, XMLObject message,
> SecurityPolicyContext<IssuerType> context)
>
> Unit tests are still failing on java-opensaml2 also for me.
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chad La Joie 
> [mailto:]
>  
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:09 PM
> To: 
> 
> Subject: Java OpenSAML Stack Compiles
>
> For those that want to fetch the latest development code from the SVN
> trunk, you can do so now.  Everything compiles, some code doesn't work.
>