Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Spec compliance at the cost of more dependencies?

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Spec compliance at the cost of more dependencies?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Chad La Joie <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Spec compliance at the cost of more dependencies?
  • Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 06:52:04 -0600
  • Organization: University Information Systems

As some people have noted the current XMLTooling unit tests do not pass, giving an error about keysizes. Hidden underneath this problem is a deeper issue (isn't that always the case). The Java JCE does not support a given set of functionality that is going to be required for specification compliance in areas like digital signing and encryption. For example, one spec requires support for AES 128 and 256 yet the Sun JCE doesn't support that algorithm.

So, here's the question. For those using the Sun JRE, is requiring a dependency on a different JCE, e.g. bouncycastle, acceptable or are you willing to forgo specification compliance in order to avoid another dependency?

I restrict this question to the Sun JRE because I do not know what other JRE's JCEs implement, I just know the Sun one doesn't do everything that would be needed (and I suspect most of the others don't as well).
--
Chad La Joie 2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware 202.687.0124



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page