mace-opensaml-users - SAML for Provisioning
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Prasad <>
- To:
- Subject: SAML for Provisioning
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:09:30 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V00/n7OCS94o1idUcIrpBMGG1V6NmtvlN6r2AmZB9VYNOuSkPcrnF73TUgJGzZtcJjf2SF5scYPjp4M4RocJpw/xKOopoL+rx/HvLWiF/k63USO3vGOyafW93gFIp8V6+GFtmUTd2z2vnHQ96/oZweewyj2KFPL6tjMTODLHo5k=
Hi all,
I came across several discussion where people believed that SAML can be used as a tool/protocol for User Provisioning. As far as my knowledge goes, and I am well familiar with SAML 1.X but less with SAML 2.0, I don't think User Provisioning is something that falls in SAMLs territory.
Is my understanding correct or am I missing something ? Also, can anyone think of any use cases where SAML (1.1 and 2.0) or Liberty Alliance can be leveraged for doing User Provisioning ?
Thanks.
Prasad.
- SAML for Provisioning, Prasad, 09/29/2005
- Re: SAML for Provisioning, Tom Scavo, 09/29/2005
- RE: SAML for Provisioning, Scott Cantor, 09/29/2005
- Re: SAML for Provisioning, Mark Allen Earnest, 09/29/2005
- RE: SAML for Provisioning, Scott Cantor, 09/29/2005
- Re: SAML for Provisioning, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 09/29/2005
- Re: SAML for Provisioning, Prasad, 09/29/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: SAML for Provisioning, Chad La Joie, 09/29/2005
- Re: SAML for Provisioning, Prasad, 09/29/2005
- Re: SAML for Provisioning, Tom Scavo, 09/29/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.