Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: SAML conformance testing

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: SAML conformance testing


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Matola, Tod" <>
  • To: "Scott Cantor" <>, "William Cai" <>, <>
  • Subject: RE: SAML conformance testing
  • Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:56:10 -0400

Scott, is there any work on moving openSAML to 2.0? Or others that are
doing an open source version?

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]

Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:22 AM
To: 'William Cai';

Subject: RE: SAML conformance testing

> I am going to develop a SAML 1.1 conformance test suite for
> my project. But my knowledge for SAML is limited. Could you
> guys provide any suggestions?

My advice would be to ask on saml-dev. I don't think you'll get an
answer
there either, though.

To be honest, with SAML 2.0 out, SAML 1.1 just doesn't really matter
much
any more, and Liberty is probably ahead of the game in doing SAML 2.0
conformance testing.

Ping's status as a competitor in the SAML space kind of killed their
attempt
to be a conformance vehicle for SAML 2.0 in OASIS. I haven't heard of
any
new attempts to revive that discussion there.

-- Scott




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page