mace-opensaml-users - RE: SAML conformance testing
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Matola, Tod" <>
- To: "Scott Cantor" <>, "William Cai" <>, <>
- Subject: RE: SAML conformance testing
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:56:10 -0400
Scott, is there any work on moving openSAML to 2.0? Or others that are
doing an open source version?
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:22 AM
To: 'William Cai';
Subject: RE: SAML conformance testing
> I am going to develop a SAML 1.1 conformance test suite for
> my project. But my knowledge for SAML is limited. Could you
> guys provide any suggestions?
My advice would be to ask on saml-dev. I don't think you'll get an
answer
there either, though.
To be honest, with SAML 2.0 out, SAML 1.1 just doesn't really matter
much
any more, and Liberty is probably ahead of the game in doing SAML 2.0
conformance testing.
Ping's status as a competitor in the SAML space kind of killed their
attempt
to be a conformance vehicle for SAML 2.0 in OASIS. I haven't heard of
any
new attempts to revive that discussion there.
-- Scott
- SAML conformance testing, William Cai, 09/29/2005
- RE: SAML conformance testing, Scott Cantor, 09/29/2005
- RE: SAML conformance testing, William Cai, 09/29/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: SAML conformance testing, Matola, Tod, 09/29/2005
- Re: SAML conformance testing, Chad La Joie, 09/29/2005
- RE: SAML conformance testing, Scott Cantor, 09/29/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.