mace-opensaml-users - Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To: Scott Cantor <>
- Cc: OpenSAML <>
- Subject: Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:51:51 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uG0EyNVJMaNEEJb7ZIA0FOKgXBW5FQ1E1I8NNoBBwneY+7fN2HHf9v+VH6WImUYfX0+D+DDB8ywHa8k2slNvyByLjZBjuS8jDl6xLzAsR1ek06YRgr6U6759NSTLiHq1Yi97ClLxI6xTSglo1oxQAl5L1L+ErpUcdFjycx3i7Lg=
On 9/8/05, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
>
> > This would take the pressure off GT to upgrade from
> > 0.8 to 1.1 (which is nontrivial as it turns out) and still give GT and
> > GridShib the metadata functionality they need.
>
> Unless it's the XML stuff, I don't see why it's so non-trivial, there's no
> way they're using any of the other stuff that radically changed. There can't
> be much you could do with 0.8 that isn't mostly the same now, minus one or
> two simple cases of object refactoring.
OpenSAML 0.8 in GT has been modified and is nontrivial to upgrade as a
result, so a separate metadata library would be helpful. If that's
not in the cards, fine, we would just like to know one way or the
other.
Tom
- metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Tom Scavo, 09/08/2005
- RE: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Scott Cantor, 09/08/2005
- Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Tom Scavo, 09/08/2005
- RE: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Scott Cantor, 09/08/2005
- Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Tom Scavo, 09/09/2005
- Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Tom Scavo, 09/09/2005
- Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Scott Cantor, 09/09/2005
- RE: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Scott Cantor, 09/08/2005
- Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Tom Scavo, 09/08/2005
- RE: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1, Scott Cantor, 09/08/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.