Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Scott Cantor <>
  • Cc: OpenSAML <>
  • Subject: Re: metadata support in OpenSAML 1.1
  • Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:51:51 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uG0EyNVJMaNEEJb7ZIA0FOKgXBW5FQ1E1I8NNoBBwneY+7fN2HHf9v+VH6WImUYfX0+D+DDB8ywHa8k2slNvyByLjZBjuS8jDl6xLzAsR1ek06YRgr6U6759NSTLiHq1Yi97ClLxI6xTSglo1oxQAl5L1L+ErpUcdFjycx3i7Lg=

On 9/8/05, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
>
> > This would take the pressure off GT to upgrade from
> > 0.8 to 1.1 (which is nontrivial as it turns out) and still give GT and
> > GridShib the metadata functionality they need.
>
> Unless it's the XML stuff, I don't see why it's so non-trivial, there's no
> way they're using any of the other stuff that radically changed. There can't
> be much you could do with 0.8 that isn't mostly the same now, minus one or
> two simple cases of object refactoring.

OpenSAML 0.8 in GT has been modified and is nontrivial to upgrade as a
result, so a separate metadata library would be helpful. If that's
not in the cards, fine, we would just like to know one way or the
other.

Tom



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page