mace-opensaml-users - Re: saml 2.0 support
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To: "Garcia, Gene" <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: saml 2.0 support
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:29:06 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=O+lxKjEV7MHG0UgBbTCh/qRdlBe8W5CE4i6yddpBpQU/U6gle3m6IUM4EvpGxx5vbd2qJ4oRjvoGfqPC+3de1DNlBB0Y9nordsMKkLXun8Gsrlmqb2a+qiKgiHxxupz/5cXoTOApcRmr16Km0niRjxMF7Z/5izQjB0RKC4h+Ses=
On 7/1/05, Garcia, Gene
<>
wrote:
>
> I apologize in advance if this is a common question, but I haven't been able
> to find an answer...
This is a common question...perhaps it should be added to the FAQ:
http://www.opensaml.org/faq.html
> When will opensaml be modified to support SAML2.0?
I don't know but OpenSAML 1.1 isn't even out the door yet so it may be a
while.
There are only three open-source implementations of SAML 1.1 core that
I know of:
OpenSAML 1.0.1 (Java/C++)
http://www.opensaml.org/
SourceID SAML 1.1 Java Toolkit 2.0
http://www.sourceid.org/projects/saml-1.1-toolkit.html
SAMUEL (Java)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/guanxi/
OpenSAML and SourceID have previously announced SAML 2.0 toolkits by
Dec 2005 and summer 2005, respectively, but full 2.0 compatibility is
a long way off…
Hope this helps,
Tom
- saml 2.0 support, Garcia, Gene, 07/01/2005
- RE: saml 2.0 support, Scott Cantor, 07/01/2005
- Re: saml 2.0 support, Tom Scavo, 07/01/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: saml 2.0 support, Garcia, Gene, 07/01/2005
- RE: saml 2.0 support, Garcia, Gene, 07/01/2005
- Re: saml 2.0 support, Walter Hoehn, 07/01/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.