Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: NameIdentifier / Name Qualifier

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: NameIdentifier / Name Qualifier


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Budi Boentaran <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: NameIdentifier / Name Qualifier
  • Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 20:31:43 +0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uAUaH8oZA+fd1nKwv0YUKRu/iJODIRSW8lY/lG9WFc7TkvW4OLH56g1yrKMKLGLh/1+VIo1WIjuJkFH3bOe7Nmu4zcREQzoBaENglyGtkBBn0ZltQ+i1M55FrkJ+vZo9FGqpfDisHs9sIK7aL+L1XWlOzTRNw2vfqj7+ReQ9xYQ=
Hi Tom,

Actually I miss out that each Attribute Statement can have multiple
Attribute. Now everything starting to make sense :)

Thanks for your patient.

Cheers,

Budi.

On 5/12/05, Tom Scavo
<>
wrote:
> On 5/12/05, Budi Boentaran
> <>
> wrote:
> >
> > Each AttributeStatement will require Subject.
>
> Every SAML statement needs a Subject, yes.
>
> > In the Subject you have name Identifier. and in the AttributeStatement
> > you have attribute name.
> >
> > Isn't that redundant?
>
> Attribute names are independent of the Subject. Can you give an example?
>
> Tom
>

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page