Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: NameIdentifier / Name Qualifier

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: NameIdentifier / Name Qualifier


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Budi Boentaran <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: NameIdentifier / Name Qualifier
  • Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 08:22:16 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PrpVAvevIYjf4UTnFKBtuo45+YIL2hI9MK1gIHOBG8MhBpR8kRALqybuKle6yenG/PJwZzpiJe+fuGq+E/kqzfLeXVdy6ebh8zFZYXTZrvS3es+gEKgagJZIZzE3yYUtfZzFSCt4pH4NzU6pSSZJDDOXCk4CpMCgVnxInhBdpTg=
On 5/12/05, Budi Boentaran
<>
wrote:
>
> Each AttributeStatement will require Subject.

Every SAML statement needs a Subject, yes.

> In the Subject you have name Identifier. and in the AttributeStatement
> you have attribute name.
>
> Isn't that redundant?

Attribute names are independent of the Subject. Can you give an example?

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page