mace-opensaml-users - Re: Equality of SAMLNameIdentifier objects

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: Equality of SAMLNameIdentifier objects

From: Walter Hoehn <>
To: "Scott Cantor" <>
Cc: "<>" <>
Subject: Re: Equality of SAMLNameIdentifier objects
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:21:23 -0600

In java you can't make the access control on inherited methods more restrictive because it would break their polymorphic qualities.

-Walter

On Jan 4, 2005, at 6:58 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:

There are at least a few places where logical equality makes some sense, but
not everywhere. Maybe I can just hide the method when it doesn't make sense.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

SAMLSOAPBinding problems, Manuel Sánchez Cuenca, 01/04/2005
- RE: SAMLSOAPBinding problems, Scott Cantor, 01/04/2005
  - Equality of SAMLNameIdentifier objects, Markus Lorch, 01/04/2005
    - RE: Equality of SAMLNameIdentifier objects, Scott Cantor, 01/04/2005
      - RE: Equality of SAMLNameIdentifier objects, Markus Lorch, 01/04/2005
        
        RE: Equality of SAMLNameIdentifier objects, Scott Cantor, 01/04/2005
        
        Re: Equality of SAMLNameIdentifier objects, Walter Hoehn, 01/04/2005

List archive

Re: Equality of SAMLNameIdentifier objects