mace-opensaml-users - RE: Re[4]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: 'jerome moliere' <>, 'Mark Wilcox' <>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: Re[4]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:34:29 -0600
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> I must have another look to thsi project but I must find a
> really protocol aware solution
> I must check if this solution is really conformant with
> liberty protocols, because you must
> interoperate with liberty products..
Shibboleth is not Liberty compliant, it's a SAML-based system. SAML 2.0 is a
superset of Liberty ID-FF, and so it just doesn't make a ton of sense for us
to go backward in that direction at this point.
I can't say I know of a true open source Liberty implementation, though, so
I'm not sure how much luck you'll have doing it on the cheap.
-- Scott
- [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, jerome moliere, 06/23/2004
- RE: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, Scott Cantor, 06/23/2004
- Re[2]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, jerome moliere, 06/23/2004
- Message not available
- Re[4]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, jerome moliere, 06/23/2004
- RE: Re[4]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, Scott Cantor, 06/23/2004
- Re[6]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, jerome moliere, 06/25/2004
- RE: Re[6]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, Scott Cantor, 06/25/2004
- Re[6]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, jerome moliere, 06/25/2004
- RE: Re[4]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, Scott Cantor, 06/23/2004
- Re[4]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, jerome moliere, 06/23/2004
- RE: Re[2]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, Scott Cantor, 06/23/2004
- Message not available
- Re[2]: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, jerome moliere, 06/23/2004
- RE: [OT]SAML & Liberty : major diffs, Scott Cantor, 06/23/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.