mace-opensaml-users - SAML 1.0 vs SAML 1.1
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From:
- To:
- Subject: SAML 1.0 vs SAML 1.1
- Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 17:40:40 -0400 (EDT)
Hello,
I generated a SAML response using a toolkit that support SAML 1.0 and tried
uisng openSAML to verify. I seems to run into a 1.0 vs 1.1 issue.
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-datatype-valid.1.2.1:
'20d7ba21-9e0a-11d8-b49f-3fa25feca8aa' is not a valid 'NCName' value.
Following are the properties defined in the opensaml.proeprties file.
org.opensaml.compatibility-mode = true
org.opensaml.strict-dom-checking = false
org.opensaml.inclusive-namespace-prefixes = #default saml samlp ds code kind
rw typens
What other thing do I need to do to get around this issue ? Thanks.
Soo Leng
- SAML 1.0 vs SAML 1.1, sooleng . lau, 05/04/2004
- RE: SAML 1.0 vs SAML 1.1, Scott Cantor, 05/04/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.