Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: SAML 1.0 vs SAML 1.1

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: SAML 1.0 vs SAML 1.1


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Scott Cantor <>
  • To: ,
  • Subject: RE: SAML 1.0 vs SAML 1.1
  • Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 17:45:20 -0400
  • Organization: The Ohio State University

> org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-datatype-valid.1.2.1:
> '20d7ba21-9e0a-11d8-b49f-3fa25feca8aa' is not a valid 'NCName' value.
>
> Following are the properties defined in the opensaml.proeprties file.
>
> org.opensaml.compatibility-mode = true

Either there's a bug, or this setting isn't being applied. Try just manually
calling the set method on the config class to set the property, and if that
has an effect, there's something wrong with how you're overiding the
properties statically.

Editorial comment: Java classpaths lead to hard drug use.

-- Scott



  • SAML 1.0 vs SAML 1.1, sooleng . lau, 05/04/2004
    • RE: SAML 1.0 vs SAML 1.1, Scott Cantor, 05/04/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page