mace-opensaml-users - RE: SAML Design Question
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Anderson Jonathan" <>
- To: "OpenSAML" <>
- Subject: RE: SAML Design Question
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:06:05 -0500
- Importance: Normal
And to think Scott, at first I thought you were crazy for doing it that way.
Oh, how naive I was. Your approach to me today seems very sound. Honestly,
this XML data binding issue will be the end of us all. <sigh>
-Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: Rathod, Ashish (A.K.)
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:11 AM
To:
Subject: RE: SAML Design Question
Thanks Scott.
Ashish
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 11:04 AM
To: Rathod, Ashish (A.K.);
Subject: RE: SAML Design Question
> What process did you use to derive the SAML classes?
By hand. Automated code generation (such as existed at the time) would not
allow any reuse of the DOM and forced reserializing the data all over the
place to translate between XML and "objects". I recursively wrap objects
around the DOM so that the XML only gets parsed or generated once.
-- Scott
- SAML Design Question, arathod4, 03/19/2004
- RE: SAML Design Question, Scott Cantor, 03/19/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: SAML Design Question, Rathod, Ashish (A.K.), 03/19/2004
- RE: SAML Design Question, Anderson Jonathan, 03/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.