OpenSAML user discussion

[Scott Cantor <>]

> OK, so maybe enough to say that the existing SOAP binding is not "*the*
> SOAP binding" (as it says now), but "*a simple basic* SOAP binding", and
> that SOAP bindings that want to use other cool WS-* SOAP thangs can be
> written by those so inclined.  I will post a note to the SSTC 
> along this line.

You can mention something about the binding needing some loosening around
things that might be used for authentication, but I plan to do that anyway.
I had to rework the binding language in Liberty, so I expected to propose
something similar here.

-- Scott