OpenSAML user discussion

[mochamaster <>]

Yep, cloning works.

And yes, initially i was using the same subject
instance.

/stal

--- Scott Cantor 
<>
 wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:11:53 -0500
> From: Scott Cantor 
> <>
> Subject: RE: subject is omitted in saml response
> with multiple statements in an
>  assertion
> To: >         'saml' 
> <>
> 
> > when returing a SAMLResponse containing
> >   * one SAMLAssertion containing
> >        * one SAMLAuthenticationStatement
> containing
> >             * one SAMLSubject
> >        * one SAMLAttributeStatement containing
> >             * the same SAMLSubject as before
> >             * many SAMLAttributes
> > the subject is retained in the
> SAMLAttributeStatement
> > but is omitted from the
> SAMLAuthenticationStatement.
> 
> My guess is it's a bug/quirk in the way the subject
> is being given to the statements. It probably should
> work if you clone the
> subject so that a different object is handed to both
> statements. I'll have to see what the obvious fix
> is, if there is one.
> 
> Can you verify that that's what you're doing in the
> code?
> 
> SAMLSubject sub=new SAMLSubject(...)
> SAMLAuthenticationStatement s1=new (sub...)
> SAMLAttributeStatement s2=new (sub...)
> 
> If you make the second one (SAMLSubject)sub.clone()
> it should work around it.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
>
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------mace-opensaml-users-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at 

    http://archives.internet2.edu/

---------------------------------------------------mace-opensaml-users--