OpenSAML user discussion

[Scott Cantor <>]

> Yes, that's correct, the derived object isn't constructed yet 
> at that level ;-(((...also applies to other classes like 
> SAMLAssertion (Collection statements). 

Sure. Like I said, I assumed it "did the right thing" by virtue of even 
allowing such a call to happen but it obviously doesn't.

> the solution might be even more complex, as the super 
> constructor always has to be always the first call within the 
> original constructor, so it might be impossible to initialize 
> before that as the damage is done within the super 
> constructor (but I am not totally sure)

I don't think it's a huge problem to fix. The C++ code is already structured 
that way by necessity because you *can't* expect any
other behavior by definition. I'll just have to propagate the change.

Thanks for the heads up.

-- Scott

---------------------------------------------------mace-opensaml-users-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at 

    http://archives.internet2.edu/

---------------------------------------------------mace-opensaml-users--