Discussion List for Freenum/ITAD Subscriber Number (ISN) Project

[Peter Grace <>]

John R Covert wrote:
> 
> If an ITAD is an organizational number, then at least "0*ITAD"
> should be expected, and at least following the Continental
> model for countries with variable length numbers, "0*ITAD"
> is the recommended "main number".
> 

This is what I heard when I originally setup ISN back in the beginning.
 I'm fine with changing 0*739 if that's considered bad practice for ISN?

I don't know if any single body in ISN is considered the "Linus" of the
project at this point, I'd assume we'd consider John Todd to be that guy...

John, would you consider 0*ITAD "SHOULD NOT" or "MUST NOT"?

-pete


-- 
--
---
/--------------------------------------------------------------------\
: Peter Grace of vsix.me, fierymoon.com
: e-mail: 

 (ipv6 only), 

 (v4/v6)
: PGP: 0x6DF424E9 (7AAB DF74 69AE 5896 F7BD BA1D F288 48B5 6DF4 24E9)
: facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pete.grace
: ISN: 230*739
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature