grouper-users - RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Sean Mason <>
- To: "Black, Carey M." <>, Grouper Users <>
- Subject: RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 19:24:09 +0000
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uwaterloo.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uwaterloo.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uwaterloo.ca; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2fvn8ZRyJ9bgWg0YDR0uJWxgO+rxKsxag509U1tKKh0=; b=WpSyKvepBtx7sjFxl9lkVLW/Zk6Zexmuaf3WnOLelijm07r9vbd9KUnIb6/urgEmkTd4KtsFzNlZBYdWB4K7nnLz2wGaF6EgK77T3C5GJBwLtll0cU9asoIcKXlVqRm6C6HiOMI8Ynnj6pJwxBLNmMhxppWkGP3gmNDj9NK+ehQiAX+oyC1tDrPBOdx6XDiMwPmHmQeplOJzmnQFXvA9zpgCuJgOjxeVLEpkE2e0noDCIj7uO2HikN7MU0Dj1Jz28hZjYxleCp/i2LbZRlh7Q4nVIzLY6uToJmy0uUlRMLm6LObxRgXV3xFxJC9+lrckYyVXFL0Mabnhvw0Gcf6n1Q==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=I1hlwzAbLsjyBs3XrjHlXMaLRoIL8T9TYhT+C6iqmcNycJ1njuJvfOSv7aX76Suhtf/EhdP7hLrT1agYMi93CKL3zmdWBhtbIJ04ryN3/LVZS3bagQn/9x1m8GxkycY6THApft2Bd0MUB7QXkwz3yu+lT4MCyP5VW9LjfBLpcUy0Dwot1iINVeiVCZ+qnvHqiMqWxWAVBhnc5jk27kZghcdXXttX6azdChb3KdVfsxtLi632C7kAF4uIBPur0rdMSbVUyI/TnAJRiAZFj/4hK8spRvGiC3ybloCH0ZMekjfnADzTBgNX0Tn8lGOK+l1rjbzxmR9aQheFG9x/dJWg7g==
That does indeed help, an increase in size to the schema and adding grouper.stemName.maxSize = <larger number here> to grouper.properties has cleared the issue.
Thank you for your help! Sean.
From: Black, Carey M. <>
Sean,
I found this: https://todos.internet2.edu/browse/GRP-1807
So it looks like there is a planned way to do this.
HTH.
-- Carey Matthew
From: <>
On Behalf Of Sean Mason
Hi There,
I’ve been working on upgrading our Grouper v2.4 instance to 2.5 and things are going very well now that I’ve (somewhat) wrapped my head around Docker. The system has really been a star in our IAM system renewal efforts.
One thing I have noticed that I’ve missed in our installation (this is not a problem resulting from the upgrade) is that the maximum length of the display_name field for grouper_stems is 255 characters. We have some HR org data that (believe it or not) exceeds this length.
Is it safe for me to extend the length of that field in the schema? If not is it possible the length of the field could be made to match the length of the display_name field in the grouper_groups table in an upcoming version?
Thank you, Sean |
- [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Sean Mason, 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Black, Carey M., 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Sean Mason, 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Black, Carey M., 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Sean Mason, 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Black, Carey M., 06/01/2020
- Re: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Hyzer, Chris, 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Black, Carey M., 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Sean Mason, 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Black, Carey M., 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Sean Mason, 06/01/2020
- RE: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length, Black, Carey M., 06/01/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.