Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-users - [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

[grouper-users] Stem display_name column length


Chronological Thread 
    < Chronological >      < Thread >
  • From: Sean Mason <>
  • To: Grouper Users <>
  • Subject: [grouper-users] Stem display_name column length
  • Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:25:07 +0000
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uwaterloo.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uwaterloo.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uwaterloo.ca; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+O+n2664bT6ZqDweQmTAAXu4oeGUK6XgWpCpNS++Ges=; b=EkfzBkUg2bNTO//fP8/b+wD5kNJw0+Y3tGMKtAglDay+pD4HrlLMYHRWzm6o8m6kYRnYRbyzykat/IinR0ywI9DCUUaKxwaCVGfNVvHQ84dS84Nl1h4v+XmQMdzsMnJF/ELfiYcxqFGFpRgFDiQTSVIEfDCRIn7c6YKwNg8MTmksFjRQCy3x7ngBuqPvy916vTv5LhWvWZq2WkTD3krQhnXVAfmPUkWqfzAp4W7WfJwTpNvEtUBR/8NTRJ5NvZObRxOR7m3YL4EYWkDlb3UGSxtrxfhrjjkr1StOxByxsEBBAF4Yh/Ix+TX93RBN1cmIas9R6rbzb2sw2m9veSqneg==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PH4A1CXogoByq1VcXhesJFcRVF3VolRLZg1lBJj0DAt7qn6r7/+6GbGC3mYZse14jkVQ2EQg8Q8nvOx3N9mNhQAdzX9hIAmG53x/xN5CWK98zCD7AP8AYCrA8Mz81adVecOxa7G1tVAqiCR8Uf8cYuQEph2XXgIwDNHJzOZXB0OzjRkeYM0QKkRoO48zUS0UNaEMbzzhzHm9jkKAeWjOQ7QETzGJN6+gpeYYYpc34w4f1YrcJTQDxVjPtLq5ihzmtytPycK1tCeRFYuEX+oSK0dv51a/x5oRn/Qcq6i8yw1t3mA9SywOKXEu0FwIivvfNC9o8s1vYqjnB7LSpwIAkQ==

Hi There,

 

I’ve been working on upgrading our Grouper v2.4 instance to 2.5 and things are going very well now that I’ve (somewhat) wrapped my head around Docker.  The system has really been a star in our IAM system renewal efforts.

 

One thing I have noticed that I’ve missed in our installation (this is not a problem resulting from the upgrade) is that the maximum length of the display_name field for grouper_stems is 255 characters.  We have some HR org data that (believe it or not) exceeds this length.

 

Is it safe for me to extend the length of that field in the schema?  If not is it possible the length of the field could be made to match the length of the display_name field in the grouper_groups table in an upcoming version?

 

Thank you,

Sean


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page