Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

[Jeffrey Williams <>]

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:21 AM Redman, Chad <> wrote:

Hmm, sounds like it would be useful to add a feature to show which members are actually excluded by the complement.

That sounds very Jira-worthy. 😊

 

And maybe another one to show which users are excluded because they aren't in the second factor of an intersect?

Do you envision the information being displayed in the composite or the factor objects?  On the one hand, putting it in the composite for the complement makes sense, but it'd be messy for the intersect.  Maybe display it in the factors e.g.

..._deny  2 users (excludes 1 in the composite)

..._intersct0, 4 members(excludes 2 in the composite)

..._intersct1, 6 memers (excludes 4 in the composite)

_intersect, 2 members

Maybe?

 

 

From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Williams
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 9:10 AM
To: Robert Bradley <>
Cc: Grouper-Users <>
Subject: Re: [grouper-users] Math in visualizer

 

 

 

| Maybe one of you deny’s are not in the allow’s?  So only one is
| subtracted?  Compare the subjectId of owner, and each factor to
| see for sure 😊
|

That was my guess as well, but Jason will have to comment on that
himself. :)

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the quickest way to find out is to change NextGenerationUsers' type of composite to an intersect(AND) and see how many members are both in allow and deny.  That will be your true operand to subtract from the NextGeneration_Users_allow.

 

 

 

--

Jeffrey Williams 

Identity Engineer
Identity & Access Services
https://its.uncg.edu

 

--

Jeffrey Williams 

Identity Engineer
Identity & Access Services
https://its.uncg.edu