Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] on provisioning from Grouper using a message broker

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] on provisioning from Grouper using a message broker


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Michael R. Gettes" <>
  • To: Scott Koranda <>
  • Cc: grouper-users <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-users] on provisioning from Grouper using a message broker
  • Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:34:28 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US

Carnegie Mellon University - ActiveMQ 5.9 - in production

we have simple messages designed to show pass the group name, operation and
other parameters such as description, user list and so on. messages are
assumed to scoped to the local domain - our messages are not designed for
federated use. this could change. we’d be happy to get further detailed on
message format if discussion warranted it.

/mrg

On Apr 13, 2014, at 12:18, Scott Koranda
<>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> At the recent Grouper BOF held at the Internet2 Global Summit a number
> of campuses indicated they have or will be writing custom Grouper
> change log consumers that write some change log entries into message
> brokers so that consumers may read the messages and take appropriate
> provisioning actions. Provisioning into Google was mentioned a number
> of times.
>
> The message broker mentioned most often during the meeting was ActiveMQ.
>
> If your campus is taking this approach I would be grateful if you
> could reply with the flavor of message broker you are using or
> planning on using. I am curious to see if there is a consensus on the
> message broker of choice. I am happy to record the results in the
> Grouper wiki.
>
> I am also curious to understand what format campuses are using for the
> messages themselves? Is there an emerging standard or best practice?
>
> Thank you for your consideration.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Scott K




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page