grouper-users - RE: [grouper-users] creating a flexible grouper structure
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Chris Hyzer <>
- To: Rob Gorrell <>, "" <>
- Subject: RE: [grouper-users] creating a flexible grouper structure
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:31:00 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
If you have includeExclude enabled in the config, then there is a “type” that when applied to the group will create these structures. Users can do that in
the UI. It’s a little more confusing with the loader since the loader is loading group names, and if you change to system of record later, then all groups need to be changed. Know what I mean? So you can have the loader assign types to the groups, and it
could be the include exclude type, and that will make all the structures. We do this for orgs. In my experience the includes are far more important than the excludes. So really you might only need a system of record group, and an overall group (that could
have other members too). I think you could do that with two loader jobs, or we could add another type that only does that instead of making 5 groups. This is an example: https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+loader+classlist+example+from+Penn thanks, Chris From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Rob Gorrell I've spent some time looking at others grouper environments and it seems a fairly common design principle is to create these composite groups consisting of systemofRecord and include/exclude groups. for example, the ITS department = ITS_systemofRecord
+ ITS_include - ITS_exclude. I've spend some time playing with the grouper loader to build the ITS_systemofRecord group, as well as do so on a one-to-many scale (like say across 200 departments with one loader object), but as to staging the empty include and
exclude group objects and the composite group representing all of ITS department, I was wondering the best way to go about and sustain it on a mass scale? even though grouper loader can create group objects, i gather it would not be used in this sense... is
there a typical way of approaching this in an efficient manner? would you look to just typical batch/shell commands with gsh? I was hoping for a way that when grouper loader made a new dept_sysofRecord group, the other pieces that go along with it could also
automatically appear? curious if anyone has a clever way of dealing with this? -Rob -- Robert W. Gorrell University of NC at Greensboro |
- [grouper-users] creating a flexible grouper structure, Rob Gorrell, 10/04/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] creating a flexible grouper structure, David Langenberg, 10/04/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] creating a flexible grouper structure, Chris Hyzer, 10/04/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] creating a flexible grouper structure, Rob Gorrell, 10/04/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.