grouper-users - [grouper-users] Re: [MACE-Dir] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories)
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
[grouper-users] Re: [MACE-Dir] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories)
Chronological Thread
- From: David Bantz <>
- To: Keith Hazelton <>
- Cc: mace-dir 'mace-dir <>,
- Subject: [grouper-users] Re: [MACE-Dir] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories)
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:24:22 -0800
Yes please. We assert 'roles' or group membership related to instructor,
student, and subject for iTunesU, and provision (hundreds of) role
definitions in LDAP for our document imaging system. We are not yet using
Grouper for provisioning, but considering it.
David Bantz
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, at 10:48 , Keith Hazelton wrote:
> Should we discuss how to represent Grouper role and privilege objects in
> SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories)?
>
> I would say yes if and only if there are real-world use cases. They would
> be necessary to focus and shape such a discussion
>
>
- [grouper-users] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories), Keith Hazelton, 03/12/2012
- [grouper-users] Re: [MACE-Dir] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories), David Bantz, 03/12/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.