grouper-users - [grouper-users] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories)

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

[grouper-users] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories)

From: Keith Hazelton <>
To: mace-dir <>,
Subject: [grouper-users] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:48:55 -0500

Should we discuss how to represent Grouper role and privilege objects in SAML
assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories)?

I would say yes if and only if there are real-world use cases. They would be
necessary to focus and shape such a discussion

[grouper-users] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories), Keith Hazelton, 03/12/2012
- [grouper-users] Re: [MACE-Dir] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories), David Bantz, 03/12/2012
  - RE: [grouper-users] Re: [MACE-Dir] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories), Klug, Lawrence, 03/14/2012
    - Re: [grouper-users] Re: [MACE-Dir] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories), Scott Koranda, 03/14/2012

List archive

[grouper-users] Is there value in working on how Grouper role and privilege objects should be represented in SAML assertions (and/or LDAP direcrtories)