Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] Query on Naming Conflicts - Grouper, ldappcng, AD

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] Query on Naming Conflicts - Grouper, ldappcng, AD


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Zeller <>
  • To:
  • Cc: Peter Schober <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-users] Query on Naming Conflicts - Grouper, ldappcng, AD
  • Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:18:12 -0600
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=XsQnhYIHTJR1FNjJEUSSBMJbhrloqxVeYZ4V6ceaaNLxOJCK0MkBfcxabIs8CmrrYH dOAwXVyFa1xK/gk6HswxkdOZjAD6MosqCthZR3EcCY6sQYIS9mntyElS14QbWkiehV9s 6kyxFJzIa4E4cFD591e6lrtpd/pUqXFXaI42Q=

> Sorry, don't know a thing about MS-Active Directory but if values for
> the attribute sAMAccountName indeed need to be unique in the complete
> DIT, is there a requirement to provision the sAMAccountName attribute
> on group names at all?

I believe sAMAccountName is required for security groups, not
distribution lists, and will be auto-completed by some versions of AD.

[1] http://ldapwiki.willeke.com/wiki/SamAccountName



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page