grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPC versus LDAPPC-NG
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Tom Zeller <>
- To: Aaron Weise <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPC versus LDAPPC-NG
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:00:21 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=xFUrzgzE8qDcqyYrAVmUEr8KUqe/Xw3Keel3oYYqs9WOydwnX1kbqC3XTeoPlo6iIx vfivL8eULO6kNg3R8KSKlYAKCIt4DcId82T4xH8a/MpABD+38GXLpKvjYMmzW/WlJngG 8OmA+0TR+f1LWKLx5r/GHtTC1aaL3ZpvUEaEk=
> Is there any pros/cos for using LDAPPC versus LDAPPC-NG for propogation from
> Grouper to LDAP? Is LDAPPC-NC a later version of LDAPPC; or are they aimed
> at different use cases?
LDAPPC-NG is a newly released rewrite of LDAPPC providing SPML support
and richer attribute provisioning capability. It is unlikely that
additional features will be added to LDAPPC.
TomZ
- [grouper-users] LDAPPC versus LDAPPC-NG, Aaron Weise, 10/02/2010
- Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPC versus LDAPPC-NG, Tom Zeller, 10/05/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.